On 21st century babysitting, and whether Skype will be the next Xerox or Asprin

I’ve been meaning to get a flu shot.  I’m a big believer in vaccination, and if getting a shot gives me a decent change of avoiding a debilitating, multi-day illness, then sign me up!  Unfortunately, my doctor’s office is no where near the route between my daughter’s preschool and my office, and I just haven’t managed.  So I have to say I was pretty annoyed with myself when what I thought was a basic cold turned into what debilitating chills that left me unable to get up from the couch for the last few days.

By last night, I was able to move around, but I just didn’t have the energy to play with my daughter Ayelet (two years old) and son Rafael (six months old).  My wife would be coming home from a long day, and I started casting around for ways to keep the kids engaged without collapsing in the process.  I decided to see to call my parents to see if they were available to help babysit.  Keep in mind that they live 350 miles away, in Rochester, NY.

“Do you want to skype with Grandma and Grandpa?” I asked my daughter.  “Yes!” she enthusiastically responded.  Within a few minutes, we were connected, and my parents were talking to Ayelet about her day at school and watching Rafael show off his new proto-crawling, where with a lot of effort he moves forward a couple of inches towards some object of interest:

Photo_1

My parents are very good at videoconferencing with the kids.  They have certain puppets like “Tzippy” and “Triceratops” that make regular appearances, and there are some books we both have so that they can read stories to the kids.  They were even able to get down on the floor and play:

Photo_2

My kids loved it, my parents loved it, and I loved being able to just sit on a chair and watch and rest.  Ah, babysitting in the 21st century!  I’m not saying that I would leave the kids at home alone with a skype video chat to watch over them, but it certainly provides an extra pair of “hands” at critical times.

The funny thing about this conversation to me is that while I asked Ayelet if she wanted to skype, the Skype service was not actually involved.  We were using Apple’s FaceTime.  We originally used Skype when we started a year and a half ago, but we’ve switched to FaceTime for no clear reason.  My Mom started using FaceTime on her iPhone 4 and felt that the quality was better, but I think that has more to do with the small screen.  However, the FaceTime interface is just a teensy bit more streamlined, and we’ve gotten into the habit of using it.

Somehow, for us, Skype has become a verb for doing a video chat.  Asking Ayelet if she wants to “Facetime with Grandma and Grandpa” just sounds weird.

Both Apple and Skype seem to win and lose in this scenario.  On the one hand, it’s bad for skype, since we aren’t using their service, but if they retain the “verb”, they may continue to be the default choice for video conferencing for new users by sheer association.  Apple is benefiting in the sense that we are using them, but clearly their hold is tenuous.  As soon as an even easier or better quality service comes along, we will be on to the next “skype”.

There is a long history of companies whose brand name product becomes so associated with the concept that it becomes a generic name.  For the longest time, xerox was a verb that meant “to make a photocopy of a piece of paper”, regardless of whether it was a Xerox brand photocopier (although this seems to have faded in popular use).  I don’t even know what the actual generic name for Aspirin is.  You can find a list of many more products who were victims of their own success here.

I’m sure Skype will do fine.  Video conferencing is just one example of their broad services, and it’s not how they make their money.  And there are many genericized products where the original manufacturer is still going strong; just look at Kleenex and Band-Aid.

Still, their major outage today feels like bad timing.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to On 21st century babysitting, and whether Skype will be the next Xerox or Asprin

  1. dahanson says:

    While I have not seen it in action, I can confirm that your kids are fluent in Webbish, and I suspect the ubiquity of tech in your life is the reason. A few generations back we lived at least three generations to a home. Then we went to one then to .7 (absent parent) so we were loosing the domestic riches. That included calling relatives at a distance just did not work well, even when a pic of the grand-rents was propped by the phone. Now we’re back to full bi-synch albeit at a distance but oh it is so much better. I rate our lives as at least a 3.5 and maybe even higher. I recall last year when our living room had two laptops and two cell phones all cranking in tandem – linking CA, MA, ME, and NJ , with cousins, aunties, uncles, grandparents and all chattering away happily while the great niece and nephew trotted around the room picking up on the conversation they found most engaging… and often carrying grandma’s voice in tiny hands around the room ‘showing’ her the rest of the participants. The smaller the participant the more native the conversation. As far as the littlest ones were concerned they were all ‘in the room’ . And I was there to confirm that they truly were.

  2. Pingback: Twitter has ruined @Posterous, so I am migrating my blog to WordPress | Jeremy Rothman-Shore Blog

  3. Pingback: Twitter has ruined Posterous, so I am migrating my blog to WordPress | Jeremy Rothman-Shore Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s